|  
                
   
    | 
        
  
    | BUILDING AN EFFECTIVE AND CREDIBLE REGIONALISM: 
      harnessing the available institutional potential |  
   
    |    | In the coming months, it will be necessary to follow 
        the political and economic developments in the region, including those 
        related to the evolution of global developments, especially as a result 
        of the war in Ukraine and the turmoil in the world economy and trade. 
        
       It is in this perspective that the political and economic developments 
        that may take place in the South American region (with their repercussions 
        at the social level) will demand attention, especially in view of the 
        upcoming presidential elections in Brazil next October. Likewise, the current international disorder can lead, as it has in 
        the past, to scenarios of anarchy and chaos. Just imagining the consequences 
        of this possible future can stimulate a positive vision of the construction 
        of alternate scenarios. 
 Such alternate scenarios could be the result of progress made at three 
        complementary levels in the construction of institutional frameworks that 
        promote convergence in diversity among South American countries and that 
        systematically combine political, economic and legal dimensions. We are 
        referring to the global level, the regional level and the level of each 
        country.
 From the Argentine perspective, three institutional frameworks of 
        which the country is a member have the potential, if properly harnessed, 
        to improve its ability to face economic and political international competition, 
        whose new stage is now beginning to be outlined, at least in practice. 
        The first of these is the WTO, the second is LAIA, and the third is Mercosur.
 |  
   
    |  As has happened in the past, the current international turmoil could 
        potentially lead to scenarios of anarchy and chaos. Just imagining the 
        consequences of such a future can stimulate a positive vision of the construction 
        of alternate scenarios. Such scenarios could be the result of the progress made on three complementary 
        levels in the construction of institutional frameworks that promote convergence 
        in diversity (as was proposed at the time by Heraldo Muñoz, President 
        Michel Bachelet's Foreign Minister in Chile), in which the political, 
        economic and legal dimensions are systematically combined.  One of these is the global level, in which the construction of an institutional 
        framework that is functional to a more intense cooperation among the nations 
        of the international system is continued. This is the task ahead for the 
        World Trade Organization (WTO) and will be more effective to the extent 
        that it manages to find intelligent approaches that reconcile agreements 
        involving all its member countries with the so-called "plurilateral 
        pacts". These aim to be global in scope even when they do not include 
        all countries. Could this be possible? Certainly, on the condition that 
        they reflect the realization of a genuine will to incorporate, albeit 
        gradually, those countries that initially opted not to become members 
        of the corresponding plurilateral pact.  The second is the regional level, especially due to its projection to 
        other regions through inter-regional agreements. The recent experience 
        of the Asia-Pacific countries, particularly that which has started with 
        the RCEP (Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership), can be added to 
        the experience being accumulated by the European Union (EU), still in 
        rapid evolution and to that which can be glimpsed in the future development 
        of the AU (African Union), which would enable to harness the full potential 
        of that region. These are all valuable experiences to inspire the future 
        development of Latin American regionalism. The third level is that of the national strategy of each country of the 
        international system, regardless of its size and relative power, as to 
        how best to navigate a world that is increasingly connected and, at the 
        same time, uncertain and not necessarily supportive. The quality and effectiveness 
        of this strategy will depend on the correct diagnosis of the challenges 
        and opportunities that the global environment offers every country (even 
        the smallest and weakest), if they are clear about their strengths and 
        weaknesses in political and economic competition at the global level as 
        well as in the region to which they belong. From the Argentine perspective, three institutional frameworks of which 
        the country is a member have the potential, if properly harnessed, to 
        improve its ability to navigate the waters of economic and political international 
        competition, whose new stage is now beginning to be outlined, at least 
        in practice. The first of these is the World Trade Organization (WTO), 
        the second is the Latin American Integration Association (LAIA), and the 
        third is Mercosur. Following the results of the Ministerial Conference recently held in 
        Geneva (June 12-17, 2022), Argentina will need to continue to play an 
        active role in the WTO, together with its Mercosur partners and other 
        Latin American countries, to restore and strengthen an effective and efficient 
        dispute settlement system, as well as to promote the inclusion of plurilateral 
        trade agreements in the WTO framework. In the case of LAIA, a careful reading of the 1980 Treaty of Montevideo 
        would help to reaffirm the assessment that must be made of its institutional 
        and regulatory framework, analyzed from the perspective of the different 
        areas of its competences. Among others, this is particularly true in the 
        case of the rules referring to the extent of the so-called "partial 
        scope agreements" (especially Articles 7, 8 and 14). The question 
        we should ask ourselves when reading the 1980 Treaty of Montevideo is 
        whether we are really taking advantage of all the potential that this 
        instrument offers in terms of policies and instruments aimed at joint 
        work among its member countries. In the case of Mercosur, when asked whether it is taking full advantage 
        of the existing institutional framework, the answer would be that this 
        is not necessarily so. Addressing the shortcomings in its development 
        would not require modifications to its current founding legal provisions. 
        As an example, we can mention the question related to the role that the 
        Secretariat could eventually play in bringing together the initiatives 
        of the member countries in order to implement decisions that effectively 
        penetrate reality. In addition, we could refer to the full use of the 
        instrument of sectoral agreements provided for in Article 5(c) and, mainly, 
        in Decision 3/1991. Both in the case of LAIA and Mercosur, as well as the interaction with 
        the Pacific Alliance and the Andean Community of Nations, the changes 
        that are taking place after the presidential elections in Chile and Colombia 
        are beginning to envision the generation of new political and economic 
        scenarios, which could even be very positive, for the development of the 
        idea of joint work among the countries of the South American region, with 
        a broader scope in the case of LAIA due to its Latin American projection. A relevant fact for the necessary task of imagining future positive scenarios 
        in the region is that Gustavo Petro, the elected President of Colombia, 
        has appointed José Antonio Ocampo as Minister of Finance. A renowned 
        specialist in economics, development and international trade, Ocampo has 
        also held multiple international positions, including that of the Executive 
        Secretariat of the United Nations Economic Commission for Latin America 
        and the Caribbean (ECLAC). He has recently published a book on international 
        governance and development which we have listed as recommended reading 
        of this newsletter.  In the upcoming months it will be necessary to closely monitor the political 
        and economic developments that are taking place in the region, particularly 
        in the presidential elections in Brazil, even as a consequence of the 
        evolution of global events and especially as an effect of the war in Ukraine 
        and the disarray that can be observed in the economy and world trade. 
       To conclude we will mention two events of interest related to the issues 
        that we have discussed in this newsletter. This information was provided 
        by Edgar Vieira Posada, Director of the Global Thought Center (CEPEG) 
        of the Cooperative University of Colombia. The first event is the Symposium 
        "Europe-Latin America: results of the conference on the future of 
        Europe and actions to relaunch Latin American integration", to be 
        held in Madrid on October 13th and 14th. It will be carried out jointly 
        by the Euro-Latin American Institute for Integration Studies (IELEPI) 
        and the Group for Reflection on Integration and Development of the Cooperative 
        University of Colombia (GRIDALE). The second event is the III GRIDALE 
        Congress, which will take place in Sao Paulo during the second half of 
        June 2023. Let us remember that the II Congress was held in Buenos Aires 
        and it was organized jointly by GRIDALE and the National University of 
        Tres de Febrero (UNTREF). For more information on the latter refer to 
        the March 2021 issue of our newsletter.  |  
   
    | 
         Brugnatelli, Niky, "The US-China battle for the semiconductor 
          industry", East Asia Forum, 4 June 2022, en www.eastasiaforum.org. 
          
CEPAL, "Economía digital para el cambio y la igualdad", 
          Mario Castillo (coordinador), CEPAL-@LIS, Santiago de Chile 2013 
Chander, Anupam, "Towards an Asian digital trade zone", 
          East Asia Forum, 19 June 2022, en www.eastasiaforum.org. 
          
Chen, Lurong, "Accelerating digital transformation in Asia", 
          East Asia Forum, 22 June 2022, en www.eastasiaforum.org. 
Chung, Kuyoun, "Will the Quad deliver to its promises?", 
          East Asia Forum, 22 June 2022, en http://www.eastasiaforum.org. 
          
Domingo, Francis, "Diplomacy in the time of cyber conflict". 
          East Asia Forum, 2 June 2022, en http://www.eastasiaforum.org. 
          
Drysdale, Peter; Armstrong, Shiro, "How Australia can find common 
          purpose with China", East Asia Forum, 27 June 2022, en http://www.eastasiaforum.org.
Elizondo, Marcelo, "Crónica de la (des)relación 
          de la Argentina con las importaciones", Suplemento Comercio Exterior 
          del diario La Nación, jueves 30 de Junio 2022, página 
          3. 
Judge, Kathryn, "Direct. The Rise of the Middleman Economy and 
          the Power of Going to the Source", HarperCollins Publisher. London-New 
          York, 2022.
Haskel, Jonathan; Westlake, Stian, "Restarting the Future. How 
          to Fix the Intangible Economy", Princeton University Press, Princeton 
          and Oxford 2022.
Katzenstein, Peter; Kirshner, Jonathan, (editors), "The Downfall 
          of the American Order", Cornell Univesity Press, Ithaca and London 
          2022. 
Malamud, Carlos, "Las repercusiones regionales del triunfo de 
          Petro", Real Instituto Elcano 20, 27 de Junio 2022, en www.realinstitutoelcano.org. 
          
Mondino, Diana, "La Argentina no solo tiene la oportunidad de 
          abastecer al mundo; es su responsabilidad", Suplemento Comercio 
          Exterior del diario La Nación, jueves 9 de Junio 2022., página 
          3.
Morgenthau, Hans J., "Intervine or Not to Intervine", Foreign 
          Affairs, vol 45, number 3, April 1967.
Ocampo, José Antonio (coordenacao), "Governanca Internacional 
          e Desenvolvimento", Cátedra José Bonifácio 
          8, Editora de Universidade de Sao Paulo-EDUSP, Sao Paulo 2021.
Ocampo, José Antonio, "Cooperación económica 
          internacional durante la crisis de la COVID-19", páginas 
          35-69, en José Antonio Ocampo, "Governanca Internacional 
          e Desenvolvimento" (coordenacao), Edusp, Sao Paulo 2021.
Peña, Félix, "Gobernabilidad del sistema de comercio 
          internacional", páginas 243-262, en Ocampo José Antonio 
          (coordenacao), "Governanca Internacional e Desenvolvimento", 
          Edusp. Sao Paulo 2021.
Peña, Félix, "Una agenda sudamericana para enfrentar 
          la incertidumbre", diario Clarín, Opinión, martes 
          14 de Junio 2022, página 26.
Peña, Félix, "El Mercosur afronta hoy una profunda 
          crisis de credibilidad y eficacia", Suplemento de Comercio Exterior 
          del diario La Nación, jueves 16 de Junio 2022, página 
          3. 
Plokhy, Serhii, "Atoms and Ashes. A Global History of Nuclear 
          Disasters", W.W.Norton & Company, New York 2022.
Rosales, Osvaldo, "La irrupción de China y las tensiones 
          en la gobernabilidad económica mundial", páginas 
          163-197, en Ocampo, José Antonio (coordenacao), "Governanca 
          Internacional e Desenvolvimento", Edusp, Sao Paulo 2021.
Smil. Vaclav, "Oil. A Beginners's Guide", Oneworld Book, 
          2008. 
Smil, Vaclav, "How the World Really Works. The Science Behind 
          How We Got Here and Where We're Going", Viking, Penguien Random 
          House, London 2022.
Teo, Sarah, "The Quad and ASEAN -where to next?", East Asia 
          Forum, 24 June 2022, en www.eastasiaforum.org. 
Thompson, Helen, "Disorder. Hard Times in the 21st Century", 
          Oxford University Press, Oxford 2022.
Timmer, Peter, "Food Security now top priority for G20 Cooperation", 
          East Asia Forum, 5 June 2022, en www.eastasiaforum.org.
 |  
  
    | 
        
 
   
    |  |   
    | Félix Peña es Director 
        del Instituto de Comercio Internacional de la Fundación ICBC; Director 
        de la Maestría en Relaciones Comerciales Internacionales de la 
        Universidad Nacional de Tres de Febrero (UNTREF); Miembro del Comité 
        Ejecutivo del Consejo Argentino para las Relaciones Internacionales (CARI). 
        Miembro del Brains Trust del Evian Group. Ampliar 
        trayectoria. |  
 
 |  |  |