|  Notwithstanding others, by the end of July 2024, at least three issues 
        will occupy a prominent place on the agenda of the international trade 
        relations of Argentina and its Mercosur partners. All three have deep 
        roots and they are likely to remain relevant in the future, both politically 
        and economically. One issue relates to Mercosur's own development. This became evident 
        at the 64th Mercosur Summit, held in early July in Asunción. In 
        the analysis made by Julieta Zelicovich in the article published in newspaper 
        La Nación, entitled "La resiliencia del Mercosur. Un balance 
        de la Cumbre de Asunción", (The resilience of Mercosur. A 
        Review of the Asunción Summit). The renowned specialist concludes 
        her presentation with a paragraph whose title can be interpreted as a 
        definition: "Mercosur, in spite of everything" (see the reference 
        in the recommended reading section below). In this regard, I would like to emphasize what the author points out 
        at the end of the article: "The recent summit thus marks a possible 
        and common path, with regional integration as a tool for insertion into 
        global dynamics." She also points out that "this path will not 
        be easy or free of tensions, but that Mercosur members are willing to 
        embark on it together." The second issue refers to the protracted negotiations that Mercosur 
        and the European Union have been conducting for many years. In this regard, 
        see the article "Unión Europea y Mercosur: cuatro nudos ¿y 
        un desenlace? (European Union and Mercosur: four knots and a resolution?) 
        by José Antonio Sanahuja and Jorge Damián Rodríguez, 
        cited also as recommended reading, which deals with the four knots referred 
        to in the title of the article.  This four so-called knots are: a) the EU's environmental demands, which 
        are also, according to Mercosur, forms of covert and unilateral protectionism; 
        b) the adaptation of the agreement to a post-neoliberal phase in development 
        policies and the return of industrial policy; c) the debate on the nature 
        and viability of Mercosur and its external relations; and d) the political 
        and legal constraints for ratifying a "mixed agreement" under 
        the EU law.  The third issue is manifested in the relations between Mercosur countries 
        and Venezuela, especially in the wake of the presidential elections that 
        took place on July 28. The crisis that has been unleashed in Venezuela 
        as a consequence of the elections and of the actions of many of the protagonists 
        has been reflected in the Venezuelan and international press in the few 
        days that have elapsed since the ballot. Much has been written about it 
        and much is worth perusing. In the reading section of this newsletter 
        we have included references to articles by Claudio Jacquelin and Carlos 
        Pagni. |